Quantcast
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90



  • The Impending Convention for Proposing Amendments — Part V0

    • January 3, 2016

    Note: This series of six articles originally appeared in the Washington Post’s “Volokh Conspiracy,” a leading constitutional law website. Parts I II, III, and IV appear below this post, and Part VI will be posted in the near future. How the Convention for Proposing Amendments Became the Subject of Popular Mythology Throughout the century and

    READ MORE
  • The Impending Convention for Proposing Amendments — Part IV0

    • December 31, 2015

    Note: This series of six articles originally appeared in the Washington Post’s “Volokh Conspiracy,” a leading constitutional law website. Parts I, II, and III appear below this post, and Parts V and VI will be posted in the near future. How the judiciary’s decisions shed light on the federal amendments convention Although there has not

    READ MORE
  • The Constitution’s Article V, Not the 10th Amendment, Gives State Legislatures Their Power in the Amendment Process0

    • December 18, 2015

    Note: An earlier version of this article appeared in The American Thinker. Some advocates of a convention for proposing amendments are endangering the Article V movement by claiming the states can use the Tenth Amendment to control the convention process. They are doing so even though the judiciary, including the U.S. Supreme Court, has held

    READ MORE
  • Answering Questions About the Voting Rules at a Convention for Proposing Amendments0

    • November 2, 2015

    Note: This column appeared originally at the American Thinker. In a recent post, I examined suggestions that a convention of the states for proposing amendments adopt a supermajority rule for proposing any amendment. Most commonly suggested is that the convention replace the traditional “majority of states decides” standard with a two thirds requirement. I explained

    READ MORE
  • The Constitution's Financial Terms0

    • October 28, 2015

    Note: This was originally a four-part series published at the leading constitutional law website, “The Volokh Conspiracy,” which is affiliated with the Washington Post. This succession of four parts discusses such questions as why the Supreme Court was wrong to characterize the Obamacare insurance penalty as a “tax,” why the apportionment requirement was adopted and

    READ MORE
  • Some of the Colorado Supreme Court’s Mistakes in the Douglas County School Choice Case0

    • October 22, 2015

    As people who follow education reform already know, the Colorado Supreme Court recently struck down the Douglas County school board’s school choice program. It did so based on Article IX, Section 7 of the state constitution. This is sometimes called Colorado’s “Blaine Amendment,” although that phrase is technically a misnomer. Actually, the Blaine Amendment was

    READ MORE